9.1% hikes, 18% attrition: the pay gap widens
Aon's Annual Salary Increase and Turnover Survey for India 2026-27, covering 1,200-plus organisations across 45 industries, projects 9.1% salary increases for 2027, barely up from 9% in 2026. The bigger signal is attrition, which rose to 18% in 2026 from 16.2% in 2025, reversing last year's improvement. Sector divergence is stark: NBFCs lead at 10.1%, GCCs are projected at 9.4%, while technology consulting and services sit at the bottom at 6.6%, unchanged from 2026. Technology consulting attrition held at 18.4%, and technology platform and products actually improved to 13.8%. AI/ML/data science roles now carry roughly a 10% talent premium over 2025, and 56% of employers have adopted AI productivity tools, up from 46.1%. Key signal: Attrition climbed to 18% in 2026 from 16.2% in 2025 even as 2027 salary budgets stay flat at 9.1%, with AI/ML/data science talent commanding a ~10% pay premium over 2025. For hiring leaders, the headline number is a distraction. Flat budgets plus rising attrition means the money is being reallocated, not increased. GCCs at 9.4% and NBFCs at 10.1% will keep pulling talent from IT services firms stuck at 6.6%, which explains why services attrition stays elevated at 18.4% while product and platform companies improve to 13.8%. If your compensation philosophy is still 'market median for everyone', you will lose AI, ML and data science talent to a 10% premium you haven't budgeted for. The real planning question for FY27 is which roles get non-merit adjustments and which get nothing. Teksands view: Flat budgets plus rising attrition is not stability, it is redistribution. GCCs and NBFCs are outbidding IT services for the same talent pool, and the 6.6% services number is effectively a resignation letter to your best AI engineers. The 10% AI premium is the market telling you where the scarcity is. Stop spreading increments evenly and start defending the roles that walk out the door first.
Key fact
Attrition climbed to 18% in 2026 from 16.2% in 2025 even as 2027 salary budgets stay flat at 9.1%, with AI/ML/data science talent commanding a ~10% pay premium over 2025.
Why it matters
For hiring leaders, the headline number is a distraction. Flat budgets plus rising attrition means the money is being reallocated, not increased. GCCs at 9.4% and NBFCs at 10.1% will keep pulling talent from IT services firms stuck at 6.6%, which explains why services attrition stays elevated at 18.4% while product and platform companies improve to 13.8%. If your compensation philosophy is still 'market median for everyone', you will lose AI, ML and data science talent to a 10% premium you haven't budgeted for. The real planning question for FY27 is which roles get non-merit adjustments and which get nothing.
The Teksands point of view
Flat budgets plus rising attrition is not stability, it is redistribution. GCCs and NBFCs are outbidding IT services for the same talent pool, and the 6.6% services number is effectively a resignation letter to your best AI engineers. The 10% AI premium is the market telling you where the scarcity is. Stop spreading increments evenly and start defending the roles that walk out the door first.
Got a tech role that's refusing to close?
Send us the JD. We'll tell you whether the problem is talent supply, compensation, location, process - or the JD itself.